AI for finance that never posts without approval.

It is safe when the AI prepares the entry and a person approves it, which is how we build it. The system reads the invoice, codes it against your chart of accounts, matches it to a purchase order and places it in an approval queue. It does not post to the ledger and it does not release payment. That approval gate is not optional in a finance build — the throughput gain comes from eliminating data entry, not from eliminating review.

Accuracy is high for standard fields such as supplier, date, total, tax and line items on typical business invoices, and lower for unusual layouts, handwriting, poor scans and non-standard tax treatments. The right way to answer this for your business is a measured baseline: during a Value Sprint we run representative documents from your actual supplier mix and report the real extraction accuracy before anything goes into production.

Yes. Key terms, dates, notice periods and obligations can be extracted from contracts into a tracked register with reminders ahead of each deadline. Because the consequence of a missed or misread term is high, extracted terms are confirmed by the contract owner before the register is relied upon — the AI removes the reading and re-keying, not the responsibility.

Mainstream accounting and ERP platforms expose the APIs needed to read purchase orders and write draft entries, so in most cases yes. The software and integration review in the AI Opportunity Roadmap confirms it for your specific system and plan tier — including whether the API supports draft entries pending approval, which some do not — before implementation is quoted.